<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Cable takes beating from viewers; blogs soar</title>
		<description>Discuss Cable takes beating from viewers; blogs soar</description>
		<link>http://www.billingsnews.com/index.php/roger-clawson/3550-cable-takes-beating-from-viewers-blogs-soar</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:58:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.billingsnews.com/index.php/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/3550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Mark Tokarski says:</title>
			<link>http://www.billingsnews.com/index.php/roger-clawson/3550-cable-takes-beating-from-viewers-blogs-soar#comment-46</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Kailey's comment is fairly typical of blog fare, and Democrats too ... glib, unremarkable, conventional and boring. I'm surprised you repeat it. And, of course, he's wrong. Suggest something else? Ground-level organizing and threat of violence ... usually works. It forced FDR's hand, and LBJ's. Union violence factored into the populist successes of FDR's era, and without civil rights unrest, LBJ was just that dude who invaded Vietnam. Even Nixon, really right wing, had to respond to movement politics. Of all the weapons available to people in supposedly democratic societies, voting is the least effective. Violence is easily repressed, but creates more violence, and awareness of oppression. But movement politics trumps all.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mark Tokarski</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 21:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.billingsnews.com/index.php/roger-clawson/3550-cable-takes-beating-from-viewers-blogs-soar#comment-46</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jim Larson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.billingsnews.com/index.php/roger-clawson/3550-cable-takes-beating-from-viewers-blogs-soar#comment-31</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Why pay more for cable when the web contains great content that can be viewed a la carte?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jim Larson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.billingsnews.com/index.php/roger-clawson/3550-cable-takes-beating-from-viewers-blogs-soar#comment-31</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
