<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Safety unsettled of genetically modified salmon</title>
		<description>Discuss Safety unsettled of genetically modified salmon</description>
		<link>http://www.billingsnews.com/index.php/features/4122-safety-unsettled-of-genetically-modified-salmon</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:57:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.billingsnews.com/index.php/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/4122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Jon Entine says:</title>
			<link>http://www.billingsnews.com/index.php/features/4122-safety-unsettled-of-genetically-modified-salmon#comment-109</link>
			<description><![CDATA[From Jon Entine: What I wrote is not a "hypothesis"--I t's factual on the record reporting, based on leaked documents and statements from FDA officials involved in the approval process: http://tinyurl.com/bz9nyh4 ... For the record, the VMAC did vote unanimously to endorse the finding that the AquaBounty was safe...it's in the public record, and noted in my story in Slate. Moreover, as also noted in the article Purdue biologist Bill Muir had publicly, last fall, signed a letter to the president saying the salmon was utterly safe and the failure to approve the salmon (at that time) was hurting science and a travesty. All in all, sloppy reporting by Mr. Levaux.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jon Entine</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 22:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.billingsnews.com/index.php/features/4122-safety-unsettled-of-genetically-modified-salmon#comment-109</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
