The Billings Outpost

typewriter imageLetters to the Editor...

Wild and Scenic Rosebud

The East Rosebud valley is one of the most beautiful places in Montana. I remember being astounded when I rolled into this part of the Beartooth Mountains for the first time as a teenager.

In the past couple of years, controversy erupted in that valley after a Bozeman-based company filed for permits with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to put a hydroelectric dam in both the East Rosebud and in its sister stream, the West Rosebud. Locals on the East Rosebud turned out in surprising numbers to fight a dam in their neighborhood and the project was dropped.

East Rosebud Creek is one of several stretches of rivers in Montana that are eligible for Wild and Scenic protection – a federal designation that preserves special rivers from degradation, including damming.

The idea was actually born in Montana. The Craighead twins – famous for their Yellowstone grizzly studies in the ’70s – came up with the idea when the Army Corps of Engineers was planning on putting a dam in the middle fork of the Flathead River near Glacier Park in the ’50s. The idea was not that development of dams was bad, but that they needed to be balanced with setting aside and protecting the best free-flowing rivers.

In 1976, the Missouri River Breaks and the three forks of the Flathead were officially designated as Wild and Scenic. But Montana has apparently forgotten about this idea since then and has not added a single stream, despite its incredible heritage of rivers. This is a shame.

Fortunately, this spring Sen. [John] Walsh introduced a bill to designate 20 miles of East Rosebud as Wild and Scenic. Whether the bill comes from Walsh, [Sen. Jon] Tester or [Rep. Steve] Daines, the truth is that protecting Montana’s free-flowing rivers is not a partisan issue. It’s no accident that a state that produced “A River Runs Through It” also produced the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. It’s time to remember that and bring the act home to Montana.

Joel Harris


Last Updated on Thursday, 21 August 2014 15:16

Hits: 2852

Don’t cut voting rights

Women across the state are preparing to vote in the General Election on Nov. 4. Current law secures their right – and the right for every voter - to register and cast a ballot through the close of polls on Election Day. It’s a fundamental liberty that should be secured and protected as we celebrate 100 years of victories in the women’s suffrage movement, and the freedom for all Americans to participate in elections.

On Nov. 3, 1914, Montana voters granted full voting rights to non-native women. The 19th Amendment was ratified on Aug. 18, 1920. When American Indian women gained access to the ballot in 1924 under the federal Indian Citizenship Act, no person in Montana was denied the right to vote on the basis of gender.

It’s ironic that on this centennial anniversary of a step toward equal suffrage, your right to vote is under attack. This year, among the candidates and local issues, every ballot will contain two proposals referred to voters by the Montana Legislature. One of these legislative referenda threatens to revert state law back to a time when our families, friends and neighbors were handily denied access to the polls on Election Day.

Appearing on the ballot as Legislative Referendum 126, the proposal sets out to eliminate Election Day voter registration in Montana. Election Day voter registration has successfully secured voting rights for more than 29,000 Montanans since 2006 (that number increases when you include local elections).

It’s a good law that acts as a failsafe for people who need to register, change or update their information in order to vote in a statewide election.  In fact, the majority of voters who use Election Day voter registration are hardworking Montanans who have recently moved across their county or the state and need to update their address in order to cast a ballot. 

There is no reason to change a law that works, especially when that law secures your fundamental right to actively participate in our democracy.

As you consider the choices on your ballot, consider all that has been accomplished to guarantee your right to vote. Let’s work on solutions that increase turnout and enhance the overall integrity of elections in Montana.  No state that has Election Day registration has ever taken that right away from the voters. Let’s make sure Montana isn’t the first state to do so.

Linda McCulloch

Montana Secretary of State


Last Updated on Thursday, 21 August 2014 15:16

Hits: 2399

Step backward for voting

One hundred years ago, on Nov. 3, 1914, the men of Montana approved suffrage for Montana’s non-native women. This was not an easy issue and had been debated at the Montana Constitution Convention of 1889 and several subsequent legislative sessions before being passed overwhelmingly by the legislature in 1913 and brought to the voters as a constitutional amendment in the general election of 1914.  

Now, 100 years later, Legislative Referendum 126 seeks to restrict an existing voting right — the right on an eligible individual to register and vote on the day of the election. 

We cannot take steps backward in the very important issue of voter rights for all Montanans.

Janet Ludwig


Last Updated on Thursday, 07 August 2014 11:52

Hits: 2374

Carbon standards needed

When the Environmental Protection Agency announced the carbon pollution rules for coal-fired power plants last month, they mentioned asthma and how asthmatic children who live near power plants are impacted every day by pollutants.

The EPA’s carbon pollution rules are needed to prevent the worsening effects of climate change. Leading public health organizations, such as the American Medical Association, American Lung Association, and the American Public Health Association, support action to address climate change as one of the most serious threats to human health.

The recently published National Climate Assessment dedicated an entire chapter to identifying the health consequences linked to uncontrolled carbon pollution. We are already experiencing longer wildfire seasons, higher pollen counts and increased ozone levels, all of which make life for people with asthma and allergies unbearable. From increasing the incidence of heart attacks to driving up hospitalization rates, the manner in which carbon pollution compromises air quality has a wide and lethal reach.

Responsible for 40 percent of the nation’s carbon emissions, no other industry produces more carbon pollution than America’s coal-fired power plants.  There are currently no limits on how much carbon pollution these plants can pump into the air we breathe.

To reduce our carbon emissions, the EPA has proposed common sense limits for carbon pollution from existing coal-fired power plants. These limits will not only protect public health, but will ensure that power generation in our country becomes cleaner and more efficient.

In addition to helping address climate change, the EPA’s proposed plan would immediately reduce the burden of air pollution in America by preventing up to 4,000 premature deaths and 100,000 asthma attacks in the first year these standards are in place.

We urge the EPA to finalize its carbon cleanup standard within the next year as we continue to work with our health partners across the country to support setting a standard that best safeguards the public’s health. Anything less shortchanges our children, our health and our future.

Kim Davitt

American Lung Association

Lora Weir

Montana Public Health Association

Last Updated on Thursday, 07 August 2014 11:51

Hits: 2330

Walsh believes in us

One man used words and ideas on democracy to express what he believed in. He devoted his life to serving the public and defending our country. He failed to cite his sources.

The other man used words and votes to incite and shut down our government. He devoted his life to accumulating great wealth and protecting the privileged. He failed our country.

No man is perfect. No man. But I trust my vote not to the hands of the critic, but with the “Man in the Arena” “... whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood ... who errs ... who spends himself in a worthy cause ... ,’” as Teddy Roosevelt said.

“Who spends himself in a worthy cause?”

John Walsh spends his life serving each and every one of us. If only we “spent” half as much as he ... what a better world it could be.

Support this man, John Walsh ... he believes in us.

Thank you for your consideration.

Karen Lazetich Moses


Last Updated on Thursday, 31 July 2014 10:28

Hits: 2400

More Clawson, Kemmick

Appreciate your column of May 29.

Somebody should remind Elena Kagan the job of God is taken and just shut up and sit down – another Obama appointee.

Put Roger Clawson and Ed Kemmick to work more often. Enjoy their writing. You can count on no lies when words come from their pens.

Leona Johnston


Last Updated on Thursday, 31 July 2014 10:27

Hits: 2731

Copyright 2012 Wild Raspberry Inc.

Top Desktop version