The Billings Outpost

typewriter imageLetters to the Editor...

Daines voted for debt

Rep. Steve Daines, through his Washington, D.C., attorney Charles R. Spies, has complained about an ad we [Montanans for Limited Government] are running supporting Champ Edmunds for U.S. Senate. In the ad, we state that Steve Daines voted four times to raise the debt ceiling. Mr. Daines claims he only voted to raise the debt ceiling two times.

We reviewed Rep. Daines’ votes on the Heritage Scorecard, Freedomworks and VoteSmart. On Jan. 23, 2013, less than one month after he took office, Rep. Daines voted for HR 325, which suspended the debt limit for five months. On May 9, 2013, he voted for HR 807, which authorized spending in excess of the debt ceiling to pay interest on government debt. Then on Oct. 16, 2013, he voted for HR 2775, which reopened the government, and suspended the debt ceiling until February 2014.

Rep. Daines, whose 2012 campaign emphasized fiscal restraint, voted numerous times to increase spending, which necessarily increases the deficit and national debt.

The letter also claims that we falsely state that Rep. Daines voted to fund Obamacare. It points out that he voted to repeal Obamacare, which is true, and is commendable. However, when given the opportunity to prevent the funding of that program, he chose to vote in favor of HR 2775, which not only re-opened the government after the shutdown in October 2013, but fully funded Obamacare.

We are sorry that pointing out Rep. Daines’ actions makes him uncomfortable.  However, we believe that, based upon Rep. Daines’ voting record, not his rhetoric, Champ Edmunds is the conservative choice to represent Montana in the U.S. Senate.

Kathryn Kay


Last Updated on Thursday, 22 May 2014 23:01

Hits: 4354

Stapleton the best choice

For 40-plus years I have been actively involved in politics, on both sides, for many candidates. In all that time, I have never worked with a candidate as qualified as Corey Stapleton. He is the real deal, the full package and the most well-rounded candidate for the U.S. Congress.

I would like to quote, in part, Corey’s endorsement from Gov. Judy Martz:  “… He had unanimous support in Helena as the conservative leader and has the ability to articulate our conservative principles. Corey is a big part of the reason we still enjoy a surplus in our general fund … . He is not tossed around by every idea that comes his way. He is a true leader, a solder, an honest person, clear thinker and he will keep his word. He has the passion, integrity and experience to represent us in Washington, D.C. Corey is a Naval Academy graduate, an engineer, family man and businessman.”

I would like to add, Corey is a man of faith, who walks the walk and not just talks the talk, a humble man that I am honored to support. Corey Stapleton is a statesman who will make Montana proud!

Judy Crabtree Trenka


Last Updated on Thursday, 22 May 2014 23:00

Hits: 3001

Vote “Yes” on backside.

On the backside of the June 3, primary election ballot is the most important item on the ballot for citizens of Yellowstone County. The Referenda to Establish Yellowstone County Government Study Commission is an opportunity for those of us who live in Montana’s most populous county to speak up regarding the structure of our county government. If this ballot issue passes, members of the study commission will be elected in the November general election.

Many of us feel that our present structure is outdated, unfair and inadequate for the 21st century and that changes need to be made. Yellowstone County has 150,000 people and an annual budget of $40 million to $50 million yet is ruled by an elected board of only three people. That means that two constitute a quorum – if one person can persuade only one other, the whole county is subject to their decisions.

While state representatives represent about 10,000 people and senators about 20,000, our present county commissioners represent about 50,000 and are elected by all the voters in the county – not just those in the district they represent.

It is plain to many of us who live in the county but not in Billings that we have no one to advocate for our concerns and that much of the money we pay in taxes is not spent on our critical needs but elsewhere in the county. It’s not fair.

Vote “YES” on this issue.

Don Reed


Last Updated on Thursday, 22 May 2014 23:00

Hits: 5892

Daines whitewashes record

It appears Rep. Steve Daines has finally gotten the message that intruding in women’s private medical decisions is not only bad policy, it’s bad politics. Months after announcing his candidacy for U.S. Senate, Daines made the misleading claim that he does not support outlawing birth control.

But Montana voters won’t be fooled.

The truth is that Daines supports so-called “personhood” measures which, if enacted, could interfere with a woman’s personal medical decisions relating to birth control, access to fertility treatment, management of a miscarriage and access to safe and legal abortion.

“Personhood” is government gone too far, and the defeat of similar state constitutional amendments all across the country — from Colorado and Ohio to Mississippi and Oklahoma — sends a clear message: Health care decisions should be left to a woman, her family, her doctor and her faith — not politicians like Steve Daines.

That’s also why, through conversations with voters, we were able to keep personhood off the Montana ballot in 2008, 2010 and again in 2012.

Montana cannot move forward while politicians like Steve Daines try to take half the population backwards — and Montana women won’t stand for Daines’ attempt to deny his anti-women’s health agenda.

We need leaders who will defend a woman’s freedom to make decisions about her reproductive health without government intrusion, and who will protect women’s access to basic health care — including birth control. That’s why Planned Parenthood Advocates of Montana is proud to support Sen. John Walsh in his re-election campaign for U.S. Senate.

Stacey Anderson

Planned Parenthood of Montana

Last Updated on Thursday, 15 May 2014 09:32

Hits: 3615

McGrath should recuse himself

Is it possible that dirty tricks are afoot again? Mike Wheat and Lawrence Van Dyke are both running for a seat on the Montana Supreme Court. Recently, however, a lawsuit was filed by several past supporters of Mike Wheat accusing Van Dyke of not practicing law in Montana for the requisite five years even though Van Dyke, our current solicitor general, has been a dues–paying member of the Montana Bar since 2005.

On Friday, April 25, Helena District Court Judge Mike Menahan ruled that Van Dyke, a fifth-generation Montanan and graduate of Montana State University and Harvard Law School, can’t be on the November ballot. Mr. Van Dyke is appealing the ruling to the Montana Supreme Court.

However, Chief Justice Mike McGrath has contributed $200 to Wheat’s campaign and since he can hardly be considered neutral in rendering a decision he should recuse himself. If Van Dyke loses the court battle then Wheat will run unopposed this November. Hmmm.

Ruth Maatta


Last Updated on Thursday, 15 May 2014 09:31

Hits: 4165

Defend Beartooths from fracking

 The Red Lodge area has been described as the Gateway to Yellowstone National Park, nestled in the beautiful Beartooth Mountains. Come experience hiking, fishing and exploring among Montana’s highest mountain peaks. See the astonishing wildlife. This area offers extraordinary beauty and Western hospitality. Not only is this one of Montana’s shining stars as far as tourism goes, but here, farmers and ranchers can produce healthy crops and livestock by utilizing our pristine water system and rich soil. 

But how long will this last? Will another generation of Montanans and travelers be able to enjoy our treasure?

Thanks to the Board of Oil and Gas, this area could soon be changed forever. They have already given Energy Corp. of America the license to start drilling and fracking. This company proudly claims, “This will be the next Bakken.”  Is this what you want for Montana?

It is not too late to stop this massive destruction. But talking to the Board of Oil and Gas will do no good. They’ve shown they have their minds made up to drill. Our only hope is to work with our legislators to reform the Board: its makeup, lack of transparency, lack of enforcement of existing rules and oversight of active wells, and the barriers to public participation.

This is not just an environmental issue. This is about our land, water, recreational opportunities, tourism economy, and the strength of our rural communities. It’s time for us to stand up and demand change.

Nancy McManus


Last Updated on Thursday, 15 May 2014 09:31

Hits: 5639

Copyright 2012 Wild Raspberry Inc.

Top Desktop version