It’s the 40th birthday of the Samoa cookie, and Girl Scout cookie season is here! Girl Scouts will be knocking on doors through Feb. 22 to take cookie orders and will set up their cookie booths around the community from March 27 to April19.
Of course, we will have all your favorites: Thin Mints, Samoas, Tagalongs, Do-si-dos, Trefoils and Savannah Smiles – and this year we are introducing two new cookie flavors, the Rah-Rah Raisin and the Toffee-tastic (which is gluten free and only available at booth sales).
Everyone knows how tasty Girl Scout cookies are, but did you know what Girl Scouts learn when they sell cookies? By creating a plan, interacting with customers, and working as part of a team, girls learn five skills – goal setting, decision making, money management, people skills and business ethics – to help them succeed in everyday life.
This year, for the first time in Girl Scout history, customers will be able to order from Girl Scouts online with “Digital Cookie” – a groundbreaking addition to the Cookie Program.
As we launch into this exciting new cookie season, we thank you for supporting your local Girl Scouts as they develop into tomorrow’s leaders. Your investment today helps us continue to deliver the best leadership experiences for our girls and make good on our mission to build girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place.
Sally J. Leep, CEO
Girl Scouts of Montana and Wyoming
Last Updated on Thursday, 19 February 2015 13:27
As the installed cost of renewable energy systems continues to fall, small- and medium-scale solar and wind-powered electrical systems become increasingly cost efficient. Montana law currently limits how and how much power can be used to offset power usage by a homeowner, business, or farm or ranch when an installed system generates more electricity than can be used and is put into the distribution system.
This is unfair. Individuals and businesses should be free to make their own energy choices to offset their own energy needs. To address these inequities a package of bi-partisan legislative bills has been introduced and hearings are being conducted in both the Montana House and Senate.
The bills in aggregate will increase both the amount of power for which credit can be given and how it is done which will make aggregate solar systems and larger individual systems economically feasible.
As to the contention by the utilities industry that solar and wind power distribution would be subsidized by the rest of the ratepayers, public service commissions across the country have studied the costs and benefits of net metering and have all determined that net metering results in more net benefits than costs to other customers and the grid. Contact your legislators and urge them to support HB 188, HB 192, HB 294, SB 134, and SB 182. They are good for Montana and for Montanans.
Last Updated on Thursday, 12 February 2015 13:54
Sometimes the sun goes round the moon, sometimes the snow comes down in June, and sometimes the most unlikely people take up common cause. That happened in this session of the Legislature when several conservative Republicans joined with environmentalists to sponsor legislation that would remove Big Government obstacles preventing people from generating their own electricity.
It’s called net metering. Under existing law it is allowed — to some degree. You can put solar panels on your roof, and generate your own electricity. When the sun is shining, your meter spins backwards, reducing your bill. When it isn’t, it spins forward, increasing your bill. At the end of the year, the idea is to owe the utility nothing. The cost of solar panels has plummeted in recent years, and appears likely to continue doing so in the future, making net metering a good way for you to lower your electricity costs.
Unfortunately, various legal limitations prevent many people from taking full advantage of this truly transformative technology. Since conservative legislators and liberal environmentalists had joined forces to change this, you might have thought nothing could have stopped them, but you don’t know the Montana Legislature.
At the behest of our Big Utility, namely NorthWestern, these efforts to reduce Big Government were all tabled. If you want to wiggle out from under the thumb of either Big Utility or Big Government, you are going to have to tell your legislators that this is not OK with you.
Last Updated on Thursday, 12 February 2015 13:53
In January we saw House Republicans attempting to control state agencies’ testimony at committee hearings.
At our first committee meeting where we were to go through orientation the chair of the committee, Rep. Art Wittich, attempted to adopt a rule to prevent informational witnesses from testifying without first being requested by a member of the committee. Informational witnesses typically testify with first hand or technical knowledge critical to the discussion.
If this rule had passed, informational witnesses would have been preventing from sharing vital information unless specifically requested by a committee member.
Limiting informational witnesses’ testimony before the committee restricts the opportunity for every vital piece of information to be entered on public record. Other committee members and I believe that passing these unnecessary rules would have opened the doors for partisan and ideological imbalance in what the chair allows the legislators to hear and discuss.
Following this motion only two groups were brought in to present certain information.
This action merely set the stage for power plays in committee. Several Republican chairs subpoenaed three Department of Health and Human Services handpicked employees to appear before the House Human Services Committee. The use of a subpoena in this instance is unnecessarily forceful. Subpoenas have been used rarely by the state Legislature and only when people have resisted requests to testify. This should not be a commonplace measure used against state agents who would offer testimony willingly.
This strong-arming of witnesses raises questions of question the purpose of such testimony. Was this a media play intended to incite spectacle rather than gather useful information? Was this testimony compelled to express one ideological viewpoint instead of encouraging intelligent hearings? Was this done in the best interests of all Montanans or did it serve the political interests of one certain mindset or lawmaking ideology?
Restricting informational witnesses and compelling state agents to testify are all attempts to control policy discussion. We were elected to serve and represent the people of Montana, not to put ideology before the people’s work. I would hope that in the future my fellow elected officials conduct themselves in a manner that befits the enormous privilege and responsibility of our position.
Rep. Gordon Pierson
Last Updated on Thursday, 12 February 2015 13:52
A big thank you to those who plow our city streets and county roads. You have a huge job to do and you do it very well. You work long hours in severe weather in order to make commuting as safe as possible for our citizens. Of course, everyone’s road is the most important and wants it plowed first but that’s just not possible. Keep up the good work.
Yellowstone County Commissioner
Last Updated on Thursday, 12 February 2015 13:47
Do you ever wonder how the state picks which road, bridge and sewer projects to fund each year?
Historically, infrastructure grants in Montana are provided through several separate funding bills, passed individually by your representatives in the Legislature. This process allows like proposals to stand on their own merits rather than having their fate tied to unrelated projects that the state pays for in a completely different way.
Well this year, the governor’s office has introduced a proposal that puts the state’s entire infrastructure spending in one box, and then slapped a catchy name on it so they could sell it to the public. But the truth about the governor’s plan is that it is an unprecedented and unnatural spending bill — plain and simple. And this type of political maneuvering doesn’t fly in Montana.
Politicians in D.C. use these tactics of omnibus bills and “pork barrel spending” to push projects through the legislative process for their own political benefit. It’s a questionable practice that has been used for years by the professional politicians in our nation’s capital, but has thankfully been largely absent in Montana. We don’t like spending tax dollars on political “pork,” and we certainly don’t like putting that “pork” on the state’s credit card.
But it appears that there are some who wish to change the traditional budgeting process within our citizen Legislature, and are putting their own politics before the needs of the people.
A key issue of the 64th legislative session will undoubtedly be the debate over how we fund much needed infrastructure projects across Montana. Our Governor knows that the state is in dire need of this funding—having vetoed the funding passed by the legislature last session — and is ready to leverage the needs of the state to advance a political agenda.
The governor’s infrastructure proposal, self-titled the “Build Montana Plan” is exactly the type of “crony capitalism” that perpetuates the image of political corruption in Washington, D.C., and now the governor’s office wishes to make political “pork” a permanent feature of the budgeting process here in Montana.
After looking at the governor’s plan, it is pretty clear that its purpose is more for political jockeying and his re-election campaign than to help the people of Montana and their real infrastructure needs.
There’s a reason that “pork barrel spending” has a bad reputation. The governor’s plan is just like something you would see in Congress. It’s a plan where pet projects are paid for with the taxpayers’ credit card.
Fortunately for Montana, there are plenty of responsible individuals serving in the legislature who are focused more on helping the people of our state rather than advancing political agendas.
Sen. Cary Smith
Last Updated on Thursday, 05 February 2015 16:20